a
They are the guardians of the Tree of Life kept
for G-d’s new creation. They are seen on the veil of the Tabernacle and
on the Mercy-Seat, guarding the seat of Atonement for the whole of G-d’s
creation. They are the four heads of the living creation - the lion of
the wild beasts; the ox of the tame beasts; the eagle of the birds; and
man the head of all (again four is divided into 3+1). These four living
creatures call forth and announce the judgments or plagues in Revelation
6, and whenever they speak it is in connection with the earth.
Hence, as guardians
of creation these four cherubic forms were placed in the signs of the Zodiac,
and so placed that they divide it into four equal parts, thus uniting in
one the twelve signs which set forth the hope of a groaning creation.
|
b
Tuesday, February 4, 1997, the consequences for the apostasy
of ceding the covenanted Land, in particular Hebron, struck our people:
2 IDF helicopters on their way to Lebanon crashed into each other killing
73 young Israeli soldiers. Not our enmies, but our leaders’ sins killed
them! The warning to Benjamin Netanyahu that judgment and retribution
would be immediate for this grievious apostasy went unheeded. The price
for ceding Hebron were 73 wonderful sons, the best of the nation’s youth.
And Rachel is weeping still!
|
c
When I watched the year’s
1996 Christmas Programs I was totally dumbfounded by the blindness and
hypocrisy of Christians. They read about “Bethelehem Ephratah, smallest
among the clans of JUDAH (NOTamong the clans of the Philistines),
from you shall come forth one Who shall be ruler in ISRAEL
(NOT of a Palestinian state)...” (Micah 5:2). A much advertized program
was “Christmas in Washington”. At the conclusion President Clinton, his
face shining like that of a little boy, sang happily together with all
the other “confessed” Christians, that the “King of Israel” (not
of Palestine) was born in Bethlehem. And it seemed not to strike
him, even for just one single moment, that he was standing there as a giant
hypocrite: for he is pressuring the very people, from whom His Savior comes,
to give that very city of the Savior’s birth to the enemies of Israel,
to a murderer and man of lawlessness.
The whole world knows that Yasser Arafat is a terrorist and murderer. Yet
they love him so much, they want him to have all that belongs to the King
of Israel, Who is the Savior of the world. While they sing with jolly faces
how much they love this Jesus, Ruler in Israel, born in a manger in the
city of David, Bethlehem, they spit Him with their actions in the face.
They sing of His Second Coming and Return to Jerusalem, His holy city.
But then they have absolutely no misgivings to impose on Israel the division
of this city, to make half of it the capital of a Palestinian state (Arafat
has no intention of being satisfied with only half; he wants ALL of Jerusalem).
Those Christians speak of the “Holy Land”, and G-d’s Covenant with Abraham,
Isaac and Jacob. Yes, they even speak of themselves as being the “true”
seed of Abraham --- but then, without blinking an eye, betray the patriarch
they claim for themselves. They insist on giving the “Holy Land”, G-d’s
OWN Land, unto most unholy people, men of lawlessness who have but one
thing in mind: to destroy the State of Israel and to annihilate the Jewish
people.
And the city which was allotted to Caleb and belongs within the borders
of Judah, which has been guardian of the tombs of the patriarchs and matriarchs,
and has been home to a Jewish presence throughout the past 2,000 years,
they also insist on giving to the enemies of Messiah and Israel.
This “Christian” blindness is so beyond all comprehension, so beyond all
possible realms of belief and imaginable height of hypocrisy, that I have
only one explanation: G-d Himself has established them in the arrogance
and wicked conceit of their heart just as He had done with pharaoh, in
order that it may become plain who they really are and to whom they belong.
They most certainly are not Messiah’s, for they can neither see, perceive
nor understand the truth, even when it stares them directly in the face.
|
d
Neither Islam nor the Arab
world adhere to “democratic” rules of governing. Modern democracy is built
upon the tenets of Hellenism, an ideology regarded as decadent by the Arab
world. Islam and Hellenism are opposing poles. Before Muhammad united the
Arab world with Islam, they were feuding, marauding tribes, true offspring
of Ishmael. Arabs have only known a totalitarian rule, where one man’s
word decides the fate of citizens and country. Islam equally subscribes
to a totalitarian regime, the spread and rule of Islam being of the highest
priority, to which everything else is subordinate. Due to British and French
influence in the Middle East and the socialist-democratic nationalism of
the fledgling nation of Israel, the “moderate” Sunni Moslems began to emulate
some of the West’s “decadent” ways, and the wealthier of the Arabas and
Moslems sent their sons to study at Western universities, such as king
Hussein of Jordan. However, the re-awakening of Arab nationalism (subdued
by Turkey for 500 years) and of Shi’ite Moslems vengeful fundamentalism
eradicated whatever “democratic traces” there may have been. The
PLO’s rule is totalitarian, their religion is totalitarian Islam, their
manner of rule is terror, oppression, torture, spreading fear and death.
No one who wanted to stay alive dared vote against Arafat. And the few
who actually dared to run against him were given no chance whatsoever by
any of the PA’s Media branches, and have not been heard of anymore. “Free
elections” and “democratic rule” are euphemisms in the Arab world, especially
in the PA.
|
e
By the time of retyping the
edited part of this document the outcome of the elections is known. 48%
of the American public did not go to the polls to vote, almost half of
the nation. Therefore one may say without being slanderous, that the Clinton
Administration did not receive the people’s overhwelming majority support.
The people were at such a loss whom to vote for, that almost half the nation
chose rather not to vote at all than to cast their vote for a man whom
they did not want to entrust with the mandate of leading the greatest nation
on the face of the earth. With this statement I do not mean to slight Bob
Dole and his charming wife. In fact, I would venture to say that had MRS.
DOLE run for the presidency, she might have won the mandate of the people.
What caused Bob Dole to lose the elections and Bill Clinton to win them
was above all, I believe, the question of leadership ability. Bob Dole
may be a good and decent man, but he displayed indecisiveness, weakness
in bold and quick decision making. Such weakness in the chief executive
can prove fatal for the whole nation. With all the possible information
at his disposal, and with all the counsel of the best professionals of
the nation, he can and MUST make far reaching decisions for the welfare
of the nation and her allies. Bob Dole may have been a fine senator, but
he did not show the steel it takes to be the President of the US. Instead
Clinton had shown that he can lead, and make bold decisions, right or wrong.
A weak leader frightens the people and makes them feel insecure. Therefore,
in the final analysis, a little over a quarter of the people preferred
a President who can lead, although his moral qualities were more than questionable,
than a morally decent man who lacked in leadership ability. The remainder
chose morals over leadership, and the other half of the nation chose that
none of the candidates qualified for the presidency. Then freedom and liberty,
righteousness and justice, equality for all in one nation under G-d, wept!
|
